ArticleNeurologia medico-chirurgica2026
Endoscopic Evacuation Under Local Anesthesia for Subacute Lobar Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Older Adults.
Article in Neurologia medico-chirurgica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery for intracerebral hemorrhage is typically performed in the acute phase; however, in frail older adults, the risks of general anesthesia may outweigh the benefits of an early intervention. This study evaluated a "consistency-guided" strategy, in which hematoma evacuation is delayed until liquefaction allows endoscopic removal under local anesthesia. We retrospectively analyzed patients aged ≥70 years with lobar hemorrhages of ≥30 mL, excluding deep-seated types. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: subacute endoscopic surgery performed between days 7 and 14 based on hematoma consistency, acute craniotomy performed for neurological deterioration, and conservative management. The hematoma evacuation rate, operative metrics, complications, and functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale at 90 days and Functional Independence Measure gain. Among the 43 patients (endoscopic: 18, craniotomy: 11, conservative: 14), baseline hemorrhage severity was comparable across groups, with mean intracerebral hemorrhage scores of 3.07, 2.27, and 2.64, respectively. The endoscopic group achieved a high evacuation rate (median 88%) with significantly shorter operative times than the craniotomy group (50 vs. 180 min) and had no postoperative respiratory complications. Although the median 90-day modified Rankin Scale score was 5 across all groups, the endoscopic group demonstrated significantly greater Functional Independence Measure gain compared with conservative management, particularly among patients with hematoma volumes ≥40 mL. Delayed endoscopic evacuation under local anesthesia appears to be a feasible and safe strategy for older adults with frailty and may contribute to improved functional recovery in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42572282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.