ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Treatment Goals for Primary Biliary Cholangitis, an Australian Perspective.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease that targets the small intrahepatic bile ducts with diagnosis based on elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels and the presence of anti-mitochondrial antibodies. Untreated, it may run a progressive course to cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation, at which point liver transplantation is the only effective treatment. This review provides discussion of PBC treatment goals in the Australian context. People with PBC often experience a quality of life burden characterized by fatigue and itch. Extra-hepatic associations may include osteoporosis, Sjögren's syndrome, and thyroid dysfunction. Established baseline risk factors for progression are male gender, young age at onset (< 45 years), ALP > 1.5 × upper limit of normal (ULN), presence of anti-gp210 antibodies, and significant liver fibrosis at diagnosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the mainstay of therapy and improves outcomes including transplant-free survival. Patients with inadequate response to UDCA (about 40%), disease progression, or bothersome symptoms require additional second-line (2L) therapy. Second-line treatments include selective peroxisome proliferator-associated receptor (PPAR) agonists, obeticholic acid (OCA; subject to precautions), and off-label use of fenofibrate. In Australia, reimbursement for 2L therapies relies on ALP ≥ 1.67 × ULN or total bilirubin between 1 and 2 × ULN after 1 year of UDCA therapy. Normalization of ALP is an aspirational treatment target with increasing evidence for improved outcomes. Proactive and diligent monitoring of patients with PBC allows personalized selection and early initiation of effective and well-tolerated 2L therapies with potential for improved outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.