ArticleIsrael journal of health policy research2026
Extending geriatric care beyond traditional settings: lessons from a mobile assessment program.
Article in Israel journal of health policy research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs populations age, changing living conditions and declining self-advocacy often create barriers to essential care. Mobile Geriatric Teams (MGTs) offer a potential solution by providing assessments within a patient's regular environment, potentially reaching underdiagnosed and undertreated individuals who struggle to access routine healthcare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact and reach of MGTs in the Northern District of Israel. Specifically, we aimed to assess the extent of MGT-initiated Comprehensive Geriatric Assessments and compare therapeutic and diagnostic outcomes between patients seen by MGTs and those receiving standard community-based geriatric consultations.
methodsThis is a retrospective, data-based study serving as a proof-of-concept evaluation for MGT implementation in Israel. The intervention was implemented in MHS between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023, and data were collected 3 and 6 months after the MGT appointment. Group comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. In addition, we performed matched logistic regression models.
resultsA total of 8,152 individuals were included in the study; 4,348 were assessed by MGTs. The MGT group participants were slightly older and had a higher proportion of males and a lower SES category than the comparison group. The MGTs group had fewer diagnoses of mild cognitive impairment, dementia, and depression, compared to the comparison group. They also had more diagnoses of orthostatic hypotension, and they were more likely to be assessed for fall risk. The MGT group was also prescribed fewer medications in the months following the assessment. After the MGT intervention, we report an increase in primary care visits in the relevant population in the district where it was implemented, while the comparison group did not have a corresponding trend.
conclusionsIn this study, we demonstrated that MGTs can reach a specific subpopulation of the elderly who might not otherwise undergo a geriatric assessment, primarily males, those of low SES, and possibly those with less urgent health concerns. These findings highlight the complementary role of MGTs in increasing accessibility, promoting equity, and addressing unmet needs in populations less likely to seek care on their own.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.