ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2026
Identifying Pregnancies in Population-Based Data Sources: Development and Application of the ConcePTION Pregnancy Algorithm.
Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Appropriate definition of childbirth using Japanese administrative database: a cross-sectional cohort validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
48 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIn 2019, the Innovative Medicines Initiative funded the ConcePTION project to enhance monitoring of medication safety in pregnancy and breastfeeding. This paper describes how the ConcePTION Pregnancy Algorithm (PA) identified pregnancies in 10 diverse European electronic healthcare data sources and estimated their duration.
methodsData sources from six European countries were mapped to the ConcePTION Common Data Model. Any pregnancy-related record was retrieved from various available data banks, including birth register, primary care records, and hospital records, and reconciled into episodes of pregnancy (starting between 01/2015 and 12/2019), each with start date, end date, and type of end. A random forest model was used to estimate missing gestational ages for incomplete records. Parameters were tailored to data sources to address local variations in data availability, collection, and governance. Model performance was evaluated using cross-validated Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE).
resultsThe PA identified ~2.7 million pregnancies, in over 2.2 million individuals. Most ended in live births (50%-83%), 1%-15% in elective terminations, and 4%-10% in spontaneous abortions, depending on data sources. Pregnancies with unknown type of end were also retrieved (2%-34%). Gestational age was predicted for 6%-89% of records (RMSE: 17-50 days). The median gestational age at first identified pregnancy record ranged from 47 to 280 days.
conclusionsWe developed an open-source algorithm to identify and date pregnancies, including early-stage pregnancies with unknown end and/or ongoing at the time of data extraction. This algorithm may facilitate multinational studies, improving generation of timely real-world evidence about use and safety of medicinal products in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.