ArticleNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
Risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with gabapentin versus duloxetine in older adults with neuropathic pain: a target trial emulation cohort study.
Article in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gabapentin and duloxetine are common treatments for neuropathic pain in adults over 65, but data on their gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding risk are limited. We compared GI bleeding risk after starting gabapentin or duloxetine in this population. We used the TriNetX US Collaborative Network to conduct an active-comparator cohort study using target trial emulation. Patients aged 65 years and above with neuropathic pain diagnosed between January 2020 and December 2024 were included, excluding those with prior GI bleeding, major depressive disorder, or thrombocytopenia. Propensity score matching balanced key covariates. The main outcome was GI bleeding within 24 months, analyzed with Cox regression; secondary analyses included upper/lower GI bleeding, mortality, and hospitalization. Negative controls assessed confounding. The study analyzed 62,926 patients (55,236 gabapentin; 7,690 duloxetine) and matched 7,599 pairs. GI bleeding was less common with gabapentin initiators (1.22%) than duloxetine initiators (2.49%), showing an absolute risk reduction of 1.27% (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.84-0.89, p < 0.0001), mainly for upper GI bleeding (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.29-0.53). Lower GI bleeding results were not significant. Gabapentin also showed slightly lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.84-0.90). Negative control outcomes revealed no notable associations. In older adults with neuropathic pain, gabapentin initiation was associated with a lower risk of GI bleeding than duloxetine, especially for upper GI bleeding. As both drugs offer comparable analgesic efficacy, GI bleeding risk may be a relevant consideration when choosing between them. These findings are hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in independent datasets and prospective comparative studies will confirm the data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42571673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.