ReviewCureus2026
The Association Between COVID-19 and Herpes Zoster in Adult Populations: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‑CoV‑2), has been associated with a wide range of dermatological manifestations. Herpes zoster (HZ), also known as shingles, has been increasingly reported in adults with COVID‑19 infection. Several reports suggest that SARS‑CoV‑2-associated immune dysregulation, particularly lymphopenia and impaired T-cell-mediated immunity, may contribute to varicella-zoster virus (VZV) reactivation. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the temporal relationship between COVID‑19 infection and shingles rash, including the onset, clinical outcomes, prognostic implications, recovery, and relationship with lymphopenia. This study was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic literature review was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases for studies published within the last five years. Search terms included "COVID‑19", "SARS-CoV-2", "herpes zoster" and "shingles rash". Inclusion criteria consisted of case reports, case series, cohort studies, systematic reviews, and research studies. Studies included were in the English language. Studies not relevant to the research question, paediatric cohorts, or commenting on vaccination were excluded. Fifty-seven studies (N=57) were initially identified through database search, with 35 studies (N=35) deemed relevant to the research question following screening. Twenty-five studies (N=25) were excluded due to data not being relevant to the research question, paediatric cohort data, or vaccination-related data. After exclusion, 10 studies (N=10) were included in the review for qualitative analysis. Most studies demonstrated a temporal association between COVID‑19 infection and HZ occurrence. HZ rash developed from two days before COVID‑19 symptoms and up to 70 days after infection, with an average onset approximately 17 days after COVID‑19 diagnosis. Several studies reported that HZ preceded or coincided with COVID‑19 symptoms, suggesting that shingles may serve as an early indicator of SARS‑CoV‑2 infection. Associated lymphopenia was noted, suggesting that COVID-19-induced immune dysregulation contributes to VZV reactivation. Most patients recovered from HZ rash following antiviral therapy, although severe complications and prolonged hospitalisation were observed in cases involving co-infection and systemic disease. Overlooking this possible association may result in an undiagnosed COVID-19 infection in those presenting with shingles rash and a higher risk of developing long COVID. The reviewed studies indicate that COVID-19 may be associated with HZ reactivation in the general adult population, although causality remains unproven. This detailed data analysis and systematic review demonstrate that evidence is scarce in this domain, which warrants larger epidemiological and immunological studies as well as further meta-analyses to determine the prognostic significance of shingles rash in COVID‑19 infection, in particular long COVID.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.