ArticleMilitary Medical Research2026
Chinese expert consensus on wound repair of venous leg ulcers (2025 edition).
Article in Military Medical Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) result from a multifactorial interplay of etiological factors, posing significant challenges in clinical management. Effective treatment requires a comprehensive assessment to identify the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, followed by the implementation of an individualized, multidisciplinary approach that integrates the expertise of vascular surgeons, wound care specialists, and other pertinent healthcare professionals. Although both domestic and international vascular surgery societies, as well as other relevant specialties, have issued consensus statements on the diagnosis and treatment of VLUs or clinical guidelines for managing chronic lower extremity venous diseases, there remains a notable gap in systematic guidance specifically focused on wound repair for VLUs. In particular, standardized protocols for surgical wound repair are either lacking or insufficiently detailed in these documents. With the establishment and advancement of wound repair as a specialized field in China, Chinese experts have accumulated substantial clinical experience in the diagnosis and management of VLU-related wound healing. To standardize the surgical repair of VLUs and improve both therapeutic outcomes and patients' quality of life, the Wound Repair Professional Committee of the Chinese Medical Doctor Association convened a panel of multidisciplinary experts for extensive deliberations. Based on a synthesis of current international and domestic evidence and clinical practice, the committee reached consensus on evidence-based recommendations for key issues in VLU wound management, including debridement techniques, indications, timing, and approaches to wound repair for VLUs. This consensus is intended to serve as a practical reference for clinicians involved in the care of patients with VLUs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.