ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026
Continuous clinical and radiological follow-up of isainlay reverse shoulder prostheses: results from the isa registry with a minimum of 1-year follow-up.
Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) has been the subject of numerous studies reporting promising clinical outcomes which has led to its widespread use as the most common implant in shoulder arthroplasty today. However, few mid-term studies have reported outcomes of newer stem designs. This study evaluates the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a reverse shoulder prosthesis with an inlay stem design, through a multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis. Methods: This retrospective study included 856 patients who underwent primary implantation of the isainlay, a reverse total shoulder prosthesis with an inlay stem design, between March 2019 and October 2024. Data were collected at pre-operative and post-operative time points (1 year, 3 years, and 5 years). The clinical outcomes were assessed using: Constant-Murley Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Simple Shoulder Test, Subjective Shoulder Value, and visual analog scale for pain. Radiological assessments, including the presence of osteolysis around the humeral stems of the prostheses, were also performed at the key follow-up visits. Results: At each follow-up, patients implanted with the isainlay stem design prosthesis demonstrated significant improvements in both pain and shoulder function ( Conclusion: Over the 5-year results, this reverse prosthesis design demonstrated favorable clinical and radiographic outcomes, comparable to those of other rTSA implants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.