ReviewEClinicalMedicine2026
Circulating tumor DNA in gastrointestinal cancers: promise, pitfalls, and the path forward.
Review in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a powerful prognostic biomarker in gastrointestinal (GI) oncology, with the strongest evidence in colorectal cancer. Postoperative ctDNA positivity identifies patients at high risk of recurrence, and serial clearance patterns further refine risk. However, prognostic validity has not consistently translated into treatment-selection utility. In stage II colon cancer, DYNAMIC supported chemotherapy de-escalation without compromising recurrence-free survival, whereas DYNAMIC-III showed that escalation in ctDNA-positive stage III disease did not improve outcomes. More recent randomized data from CIRCULATE suggest that ctDNA-positive patients with proficient mismatch repair and microsatellite-stable stage II colon cancer may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, although the intention-to-treat primary endpoint was not statistically significant. COBRA further highlights the vulnerability of low-risk populations to assay-dependent interpretation and unvalidated clearance endpoints. Outside colorectal cancer, ctDNA is strongly prognostic in gastro-esophageal, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers, but evidence supporting ctDNA-directed treatment remains limited. Assay heterogeneity, variable tumor shedding, postoperative sampling timing, false-positive and false-negative results, and uncertain benefit from treating molecular recurrence before radiographic disease remain major barriers. Prospective trials must show that biomarker-guided interventions improve patient-important outcomes before ctDNA can serve as a stand-alone treatment mandate across GI cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.