Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571410›Full record

ArticleJournal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty2026

Predictive factors for return to work after shoulder arthroplasty.

Willem Geuskens, Alexander Poelmans, Anthony Timmerman, Willem-Jan Metsemakers, Filip Verhaegen, Philippe Debeer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Willem GeuskensDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Alexander PoelmansDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Anthony TimmermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Willem-Jan MetsemakersDepartment of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Filip VerhaegenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe DebeerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Return to work (RTW) is a crucial outcome parameter for active patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. However, literature reporting on RTW rates is scarce. The purpose of this study was to assess the RTW rate following shoulder arthroplasty in patients of working age and to identify factors associated with successful RTW. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients under 63 years of age who underwent shoulder arthroplasty with a minimal follow-up of 2 years. Participants completed 2 types of questionnaires: a work-specific questionnaire and questionnaires to assess their shoulder function (the Patient-Derived Constant Murley Score, the Subjective Shoulder Value, Oxford Shoulder Score, the Simple Shoulder Test, and a Work-Related Questionnaire for Upper extremity disorders). Factors related to RTW were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney Results: Out of the 103 included patients, 69 (67.0%) returned to work, with 40 of them (58.0%) resuming their previous job full-time. The mean time to RTW was 16 weeks. Factors associated with successful RTW included higher educational level, less physically demanding work, pre-operative sick leave of less than one year, and post-operative support received at work. Age, gender, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of procedure, indication for surgery, and post-operative complications did not significantly influence RTW rates. Patients who returned to work showed significantly better patient-reported outcome measures. Conclusion: Sixty-seven percent of patients successfully returned to work after shoulder arthroplasty. Predictive factors for successful RTW included educational level, job physicality, pre-operative sick leave, and the extent of post-operative support received at work. Neither the type of arthroplasty, indication for surgery, presence of complications nor the need for revision surgery significantly impacted RTW outcomes. These findings may guide pre-operative counseling and help to manage post-operative work-related expectations in patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty.

Indexed as

Cuff tear arthropathyOccupational outcomesOsteoarthritisPatient-reported outcome measuresReturn to workShoulder arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID42571410
PMCPMC13452306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.