ReviewJournal of bone oncology2026
Anti-resorptive agents in neuroendocrine bone metastases - A systematic review.
Review in Journal of bone oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Bone metastases are common in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and frequently result in skeletal complications. The current role of anti-resorptive agents for these patients is not known. Methods: A systematic review process was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and a PICOS framework searching the Embase, Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane library and Web of Science databases to identify studies reporting the use of anti-resorptive agents in patients with well-differentiated NENs who have bone metastases. Results: A total of 2424 articles were identified with 104 selected for full text review. After review, five retrospective studies were included in the review. Study design was heterogenous, and treatment details typically poorly described. A total of 348 patients were included in the review, of whom 206 received anti-resorptive treatment. One study ( Conclusion: Currently, there are insufficient data as to the role of anti-resorptive agents in patients with NENs and a prospective trial is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.