ArticleOphthalmology science2026
Stage-Specific Morphofunctional Evaluation of Idiopathic Macular Holes Using En Face OCT Imaging.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate stage-specific morphofunctional relationships in idiopathic macular holes (IMHs) and determine whether stage 2‑specific features could be explained by hole size alone. Design: Retrospective observational study. Participants: A total of 105 eyes with IMHs and available 3-month postoperative follow-up data. Methods: Eyes were stratified by Gass stage into stage 2 and stage 3 to 4 groups and by International Vitreomacular Traction Study size criteria into small and medium-to-large groups. Associations between preoperative optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters and best-corrected visual acuity were assessed using interaction, stratified, and multivariable regression analyses. Main Outcome Measures: Associations between preoperative morphological parameters and best-corrected visual acuity before surgery and at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Results: Preoperative interactions with stage were significant for minimum linear diameter, minimum area/foveal avascular zone ratio, and minimum area. Stage 3 to 4 showed consistent morphofunctional associations, whereas stage 2 showed less consistent associations not fully explained by hole size. In multivariable analyses, predictors were more stable in stage 3 to 4 than in stage 2. Size-based classification showed less consistent patterns than stage-based stratification. Conclusions: Stage 2 IMHs showed less consistent morphofunctional relationships than stage 3 to 4, and these differences were not fully explained by measured OCT-based size parameters alone. These findings support stage-aware interpretation of OCT-derived biomarkers and may inform future prognostic studies in IMHs. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.