ArticleCase reports in surgery2026
Isolated Testicular Tuberculosis Mimicking a Testicular Tumor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Article in Case reports in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Isolated Testicular Tuberculosis Mimicking a Testicular Tumor: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.Case reports in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Testicular tuberculosis is a rare form of extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB). Due to the nonspecific nature of its clinical manifestations and imaging features, it is often misdiagnosed as a malignant testicular tumor, leading to unnecessary radical orchiectomy. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is essential for organ preservation and appropriate antituberculous therapy. Case: A 59‑year‑old male patient was admitted with a 4‑day history of left testicular enlargement. Pre‑admission ultrasonography suggested "a solid mass in the left testicle, suspected seminoma." Physical examination revealed enlargement of the left testicle with moderate consistency. Scrotal ultrasound, contrast‑enhanced ultrasound, and enhanced CT all supported the diagnosis of testicular malignancy. The patient underwent left radical orchiectomy. However, postoperative pathology revealed extensive acute and chronic inflammatory cell infiltration, caseous necrosis, and granulomatous inflammation within the testicular tissue, consistent with tuberculous pathology. The final pathological diagnosis was "left testicular tuberculosis." Conclusion: Testicular tuberculosis is an important differential diagnosis for testicular tumors. Despite advances in modern imaging techniques, atypical presentation remains highly prone to misdiagnosis. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for testicular tuberculosis in patients with atypical clinical and imaging findings of testicular masses. When feasible, obtaining tissue samples for histopathological and molecular examination preoperatively or intraoperatively may be crucial in avoiding unnecessary orchiectomy and achieving organ preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.