Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571289›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2026

Tissue response to the use of synthetic and biological meshes in implant-based breast surgery: A histomorphological case-series of six patients.

James Stathakios, Peter F Koltz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James StathakiosUniversity of Toledo Department of Surgery, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.
Peter F KoltzUniversity of Toledo Department of Surgery, 3000 Arlington Ave, Toledo, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of mesh in implant-based breast surgery, histologic characterization of mesh-associated tissue responses remains limited. This retrospective case series examines the histologic features of 6 tissue biopsy specimens, which feature explanted mesh from 6 patients who underwent revision breast surgery. Revision procedures occurred between 4 and 36 months after initial implantation of the mesh. All tissue samples underwent objective scoring across predefined histologic categories and descriptive pathologic assessment. Evaluation of the specimens revealed immune cell infiltration predominantly composed of macrophages, an acute inflammatory response and foreign body reaction that diminished progressively over time, and organized deposition of an extracellular collagen matrix without fibrosis of the tissue at later time points. These histologic findings may be helpful considerations in the overall evaluation of mesh performance.

Indexed as

Biocompatible materialsBreast reconstructionSurgical meshTissue remodeling

Identifiers

PMID42571289
PMCPMC13451910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.