ArticleiScience2026
Carbon-to-ATP ratios across the kingdoms of life.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating biomass is essential for quantifying energy flow, nutrient cycling, and ecosystem functioning across the biosphere. For nearly 60 years, the cellular carbon-to-ATP ratio (C:ATP, g/g) has been used to estimate marine microbial biomass, often assuming a value near 250. Here we compile ∼400 measurements from more than 80 studies spanning bacteria, unicellular eukaryotes, animals, plants, and tissues, and show that C:ATP varies by five orders of magnitude across species, physiological states, and environmental conditions. We then develop a mechanistic model demonstrating this variation arises from differences in ATP production rate, ATP turnover time, and the fraction of metabolically active carbon. The model predicts that median C:ATP is within a factor of two of 250 for bacteria and unicellular marine eukaryotes, while systematically differing in other groups. These results indicate that C:ATP should be treated as a context-dependent physiological quantity in biomass estimation and metabolic modeling across organisms and environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.