Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571260›Full record

ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026

One Health: An epistemological genealogy.

Joana Afonso, Júlio Belo Fernandes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joana AfonsoUniversidad Católica de Murcia (UCAM), Campus los Jerónimos, 30107 Murcia, Spain.
Júlio Belo FernandesEgas Moniz Center of Interdisciplinary Research (CiiEM), Egas Moniz School of Health & Science, Monte da Caparica, 2829-511 Almada, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concept of One Health is commonly framed as an integrative model linking human, animal, and environmental health. While this articulation has been essential for policy development and institutional alignment, it remains descriptive mainly and can obscure the paradigm's epistemological foundations. This article argues that One Health should be understood not merely as a coordination framework, but as the contemporary consolidation of a long-standing interdisciplinary mode of knowing health. Using a genealogical approach, we trace convergent lines of thought across philosophy, ecology, medicine and veterinary science, public health, nursing, and social sciences. Across these traditions, recurring commitments emerge: health as relational and situated; causality as multi-level, non-linear, and distributed across human-animal-environment interactions; and ethical responsibility toward the ecological conditions that sustain life. Recognising this lineage reframes One Health as a way of knowing: one that requires concepts, methods, and responsibilities commensurate with entangled human-animal-environment realities.

Indexed as

CareEpistemologyGenealogyHealth paradigmsInterdisciplinarityOne Health

Identifiers

PMID42571260
PMCPMC13451898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.