ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026
Patient-Specific Deep Reinforcement Learning for Proton Beam Delivery Under Inter-Phase Variations.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Proton therapy is challenged by tumor motion, particularly for lung tumors affected by respiratory-induced motion. Conventional planning strategies compensate for this motion by introducing safety margins or by using robust optimization, increasing irradiation of surrounding healthy tissues. Real-time plan adaptation during delivery represents a promising alternative to mitigate intrafractional motion effects. Materials and Methods: We propose a patient-specific deep Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based control framework for proton pencil beam scanning, formulated as a first step toward a real-time plan adaptation problem under respiratory motion. RL agents are trained independently on 3 patients on their mid-position planning CT to sequentially control beam position and spot delivery. At inference, the learned policy is executed on the respiratory phases of each patient's 4DCT without any online re-training or model parameters adaptation. The agent is provided with 2D observations encoding target geometry, beam position, and prior spot delivery. The approach is evaluated against conventional static gross tumor volume-based (GTV-based) and internal target volume-based (ITV-based) planning strategies. Results: The agents improve target coverage under respiratory motion by exploiting new information in the observations during delivery compared with static gross tumor volume-based plans, with an average gain of 4.54 Gy in Conclusion: This study should be interpreted as a proof-of-concept and highlights the potential of RL-based control strategies for proton therapy delivery under intrafractional motion. While the current framework relies on static training, it establishes a foundation for future extensions toward fully dynamic and adaptive treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.