ReviewJPRAS open2026
Fatal fat embolism in cosmetic surgery: Comparing gluteal fat grafting to other lipofilling procedures.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autologous fat grafting, or lipofilling, is a technique commonly employed in cosmetic/aesthetic procedures for facial, breast, and gluteal augmentation. Although it is considered a safe procedure, fat embolism is a known, albeit rare, catastrophic complication of lipofilling, and gluteal fat grafting is specifically associated with a high mortality rate. This narrative review aims to identify the mechanisms of fatal fat embolism in cosmetic lipofilling procedures and compare the risks of gluteal, breast, and facial fat grafting procedures. Anatomical studies, autopsy reports, and clinical studies suggest that the increased mortality rate associated with gluteal fat grafting is attributable to the interplay of three major contributing factors: the presence of significant intramuscular gluteal veins, the technique of fat grafting, and the amount of fat transferred in gluteal augmentation procedures. In contrast, breast and facial lipofilling procedures are associated with different anatomical environments and injection techniques, which are associated with significantly lower risks of pulmonary fat embolism, with unique risks of arterial fat embolism in facial procedures. The literature has highlighted certain shortcomings in the current body of evidence, including the lack of uniform reporting of complications and the lack of standardized data on procedures performed. It is suggested that enhanced training of surgeons, adherence to strict subcutaneous fat injection, and the use of ultrasound technology in fat grafting procedures, as well as the establishment of mandatory complication registries, are essential strategies for reducing mortality associated with gluteal fat grafting procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.