ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2026
Diagnostics and rehabilitation of post-stroke visual field loss using innovative visual field evaluation. The impact of losing driving privileges (DRIVE-study): Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07147660 (Diagnostics and Rehabilitation of Post-stroke Visual Field Loss Using Innovative Visual Field Evaluation. The Impact of Losing Driving Privileges), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Diagnostics and Rehabilitation of Post-stroke Visual Field Loss Using Innovative Visual Field Evaluation. The Impact of Losing Driving Privileges
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The overall aim is to explore the impact of losing driving privileges and to estimate the effect of compensatory vision rehabilitation in Norwegian stroke survivors whose driver's licenses have been revoked due to VFL. Specifically, to evaluate the effect of vision rehabilitation on perceived and measured functional vision, and secondarily explore markers for perceived functional vision and functional visual field that may predict an effect of vision rehabilitation. Methods: This study is an open, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with delayed-start design. Stroke survivors aged 20-85 years (N = 52) will be recruited from a vision rehabilitation clinic in Norway and randomized into two arms: A) immediate start of eight-week home-based vision rehabilitation intervention and B) delayed start (eight weeks) of the same eight-week vision rehabilitation intervention. A quantitative and qualitative approach will be applied to assess changes in functional vision after eight weeks of vision rehabilitation, and at twelve weeks post-intervention in both groups. The quantitative analysis includes descriptive statistics, plots and inferential statistics of effects. In addition, ten participants will be recruited for qualitative individual interviews before and after the eight-week intervention to explore experiences of living with VFL and participating in the intervention. For the qualitative analysis, we will apply thematic analysis. Conclusions: The study is designed as an RCT that will give important insight into the effectiveness of vision rehabilitation for visual field loss after stroke on functional vision measured by a novel VR-vision test. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT07147660.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.