ArticleJID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health2026
Reflectance confocal microscopy detects distinct features of field damage in chronically UV-irradiated SKH1 mouse skin.
Article in JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
UVR drives keratinocyte clonal expansion and cutaneous field damage, yet the assessment of early UV-induced field damage remains subjective and lacks an objective, non-invasive method. Reflectance confocal microscopy provides near-histologic imaging of the epidermis and may enable the detection of subclinical UV-induced changes before overt lesion development. Using SKH1 hairless mice, reflectance confocal microscopy images were analyzed during an early post-UV period at weeks 12 and 14 and a late post-UV period at weeks 16 and 18, corresponding to 6-8 and 2-4 weeks before the first visible tumor emergence, respectively. Five epidermal features significantly differentiated irradiated from control skin. Among the 5 features, atypical honeycombing and keratinocyte pleomorphism showed the strongest discriminatory value. In the early post-UV period, the expert-derived mean positivity for atypical honeycombing was 66.7-100% in irradiated skin versus 0-46.7% in control skin, while that for keratinocyte pleomorphism was 33.3-60% versus 0-13.3%, respectively. In the late post-UV period, atypical honeycombing was 46.7-100% in irradiated skin versus 0-33.3% in control skin, and keratinocyte pleomorphism was 33.3-80% versus 0-33.3%, respectively. Expert readers classified irradiated versus non-irradiated cases with 96.7% sensitivity and 90% specificity early and with 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity late. These findings support reflectance confocal microscopy as a non-invasive tool for detecting subclinical UV-related field damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.