ArticleEvolution letters2026
Sexual antagonism, mating systems, and recombination suppression on sex chromosomes.
Article in Evolution letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The geometry of dominance shows broad potential for stable polymorphism under antagonistic pleiotropy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The suppression of recombination between sex chromosomes is a widespread feature of genetic sex determination systems. Competing explanations for this evolution fall into two broad categories: recombination arrest driven by the capture of sexually antagonistic variation vs. arrest driven without sex-specific selection. Using population genetic models, we compare the substitution rates of full recombination suppressors (such as inversions) driven by sexually antagonistic selection to those expected under neutrality. We consider both XY and ZW systems, mating ecologies ranging from random mating to polygyny with high male reproductive variance, suppressors arising on heterogametic (Y or W) vs. homogametic (X or Z) chromosomes, and the effects of deleterious alleles segregating at other loci on the chromosome. We find that even very weak sexual antagonism is sufficient to expedite the substitution of suppressors by orders of magnitude relative to neutrality. This acceleration is robust to the presence of deleterious variation, although high variance in male reproductive success can diminish substitution rates of Y-linked suppressors in XY systems. By contrast, in ZW systems, elevated male reproductive variance tends to favor faster recombination arrest via W-linked suppressors, leading to higher overall rates of suppression than in comparable XY systems. Despite stronger selection on Y/W-linked suppressors, we find that recombination arrest driven by sexual antagonism is often expected to arise from homogametic (X/Z-linked) suppressors, because their mutational input is higher and they can experience weaker drift. Together, these results yield testable predictions for the genomic distribution of sex-chromosome inversions across taxa differing in mating system and sex-determination system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.