Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571203›Full record

ArticleTobacco use insights2026

Preferred Sources of Health-Risk Information About Cigarettes, e-Cigarettes, and Waterpipes Among Adolescents in Germany: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of a Large School-Based Survey.

Stephanie Klosterhalfen, Cynthia Fedler, Reiner Hanewinkel, Clemens Neumann, Julia Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco use insights, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stephanie KlosterhalfenInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-898X
Cynthia FedlerInstitute of General Practice (ifam), Centre for Health and Society (chs), Addiction Research and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2055-7263
Reiner HanewinkelInstitute for Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Kiel, Germany.
Clemens NeumannInstitute for Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Kiel, Germany.
Julia HansenInstitute for Therapy and Health Research, IFT-Nord, Kiel, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Adolescent nicotine use remains a major public health concern, particularly in the context of increasing e-cigarette uptake and gaps in tobacco-control communication. Effective prevention requires evidence on the information channels through which adolescents prefer to receive risk information about tobacco and nicotine products. Objectives: This study examined adolescents' preferred sources for receiving information about the health risks of cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and waterpipes in Germany, and assessed differences by age, gender, school type, and nicotine-use status. Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a large nationwide school-based survey across 14 of 16 German federal states. Methods: Data were drawn from the 2024/2025 wave of the Präventionsradar study and included 21,841 adolescents aged 9-17 years from 116 schools and 1,712 classes across 14 German federal states. Weighted descriptive analyses and multilevel logistic regression models were used to examine preferred information sources and information refusal. Models were adjusted for age, gender, school type, and current nicotine-product use, with random intercepts at the class level. Results: Parents (30.2%), social media (21.5%), and physicians (18.6%) were the most frequently selected information sources. Younger adolescents more often selected parents, whereas older adolescents more often selected social media and peers. Adolescents currently using at least one tobacco or nicotine product were more likely to select friends and less likely to select parents, teachers, or physicians. They were also more likely to report not wanting health information. Information refusal was additionally associated with male gender and lower academic track. Conclusion: Adolescents' preferred sources of tobacco- and nicotine-related health information differ substantially by sociodemographic characteristics and nicotine-use status. These findings may inform the development of differentiated and multimodal communication strategies.

Indexed as

adolescent nicotine usee-cigarettesGermanyhealth communicationinformation avoidanceschool-based surveytobacco preventionwaterpipe

Identifiers

PMID42571203
PMCPMC13451740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.