ArticleDigital health
Feasibility of LLM-assisted post-discharge tuberculosis care: A comparative study of medication counseling, patient education, and follow-up planning.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Innovation to Impact: The CREATE Framework as a Blueprint for Large Language Model Adoption in Opioid Treatment Programs.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major global health concern, with poor post-discharge adherence driving relapse and drug resistance. While China's 2024 guidelines advocate for "intelligent post-discharge management," the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in this specialized care remains unexplored. Objective: To explore the feasibility of LLMs as auxiliary tools to complement TB specialists in post-discharge medication counseling, patient education, and follow-up planning. Method: This exploratory study compared two LLMs (ChatGPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1) with TB physicians using 17 standardized clinical cases. Responses were assessed by three blinded specialists using objective metrics (precision, recall, F1) and subjective ratings across seven domains. Linear mixed models (LMMs) were employed to analyze the fixed effects of participant type while controlling for the random effects of clinical cases. Result: In patient education, LLM-generated responses exhibited higher objective completeness and accuracy than those of physicians (precision: 0.86 vs 0.50, Conclusion: This study suggests the potential of LLMs as auxiliary tools in TB post-discharge management. While quantitative performance in high-stakes tasks was comparable to physicians, the complementary qualitative patterns support a hybrid human-AI approach. These preliminary findings provide a basis for integrating LLMs into clinical workflows under professional supervision to enhance efficiency in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.