ArticleSAGE open medical case reports2026
Successful cesarean section utilizing a right paramedian incision in a woman who had a mitrofanoff procedure: A case report.
Article in SAGE open medical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cesarean section (CS) is among the most common surgical operations worldwide. While transverse Pfannenstiel incisions are now considered standard of care, vertical incisions-including midline and paramedian-were historically more common. In certain patients, anatomical variations or prior surgical procedures can render Pfannenstiel incisions unsafe. Paramedian incisions, though less frequently used in obstetrics, may offer advantages such as improved lateral exposure, reduced adhesion risks, and decreased risk of future herniation. We describe the delivery of a patient with a history of a Mitrofanoff procedure, in whom dense adhesions and anatomical alterations posed challenges to standard CS approaches. A paramedian incision was selected due to its ability to provide safer exposure while avoiding the region of prior reconstructive surgery. This approach minimized the risk of inadvertent injury, optimized visualization, and facilitated successful delivery. This case highlights that adhesions and anatomical modifications from prior procedures can complicate routine obstetric surgical planning. In such patients, a paramedian incision may be superior to the Pfannenstiel approach by enhancing surgical exposure and reducing the likelihood of complications. A multidisciplinary team and adaptable delivery plan are critical to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes in complex surgical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.