Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571160›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2026

Guideline recommendations versus real-world management in early-stage testicular cancer: a multicenter survey of contemporary practice.

Angelina Strauch, Hans Schmelz, Justine Schoch, Axel Heidenreich, Tim Nestler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Angelina StrauchDepartment of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9077-0946
Hans SchmelzDepartment of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Justine SchochDepartment of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
Axel HeidenreichDepartment of Urology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Tim NestlerDepartment of Urology, Federal Armed Forces Hospital Koblenz, Ruebenacherstrasse 170, Koblenz 56072, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6033-6364

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early-stage testicular cancer is highly curable; however, overtreatment may result in substantial long-term toxicity. Current guidelines aim to balance relapse risk and treatment-related morbidity, yet real-world adherence remains unclear. Objectives: To assess real-world management of clinical stage (cS) I and cSIIA testicular cancer in specialized centers and to evaluate the extent to which guideline recommendations are implemented or deviated from to avoid overtreatment. Design: Multicenter questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Methods: A structured 17-item survey was distributed to 59 urological, medical oncology, and radiation oncology experts from the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) and university hospitals in Germany and Switzerland. Survey topics included staging, repeated imaging, and treatment strategies for seminoma and non-seminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) in cSI and cSIIA with negative serum tumor markers (S0). Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics and chi-square testing. Results: Fifty-three questionnaires (89.8%) were evaluable. Although current guidelines recommend active surveillance as the preferred management for cSI seminoma, irrespective of risk factors, 52.9% of institutions administered adjuvant therapy in patients with risk factors. For cSI NSGCT, only 11.5% always applied active surveillance, independent of risk factors, despite guideline-supported recommendations for this approach. In cSIIA seminoma, 43.4% routinely repeated staging imaging prior to treatment initiation, although this strategy is not uniformly guideline endorsed. Conversely, only 31.4% consistently repeated imaging in cSIIA NSGCT, despite explicit guideline recommendations supporting repeat imaging before treatment. Treatment decisions after repeat imaging were predominantly based on lymph node (LN) progression (⩾20% increase). Additional biomarkers such as microRNA-371 were used only in a minority of centers. Conclusion: Substantial discrepancies exist between guideline recommendations and real-world practice in early-stage testicular cancer management. While guideline adherence is essential to prevent overtreatment, repeated imaging in cSIIA seminoma may represent a reasonable de-escalation strategy and should be considered for consistent future guideline integration.

Indexed as

adjuvant therapygerm cell tumorguideline adherenceovertreatmentstaging imagingtesticular cancer

Identifiers

PMID42571160
PMCPMC13451684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.