Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571154›Full record

ArticleDose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society

Prediction of the Dose and Dose-Rate of Ionizing Radiation that Provides the Greatest Biological Benefit.

Katsuhito Kino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dose-response : a publication of International Hormesis Society. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Katsuhito KinoDepartment of Nano Material and Bio Engineering, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Tokushima Bunri University, Takamatsu-shi, Kagawa, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0029-2360

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the existence of linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis in the low-dose region has not been confirmed, we previously proposed the "hormesis-coupled LNT theory." Because this theory does not consider the effect of dose-rate, we applied our theory to different dose-rates using data from the previous reference (Yoshida et al. 2008). As a result, we calculated that the biological benefit via radiation can be observed at a dose-rate of <1 mGy/h. In the future, biologically beneficial factors may be identified by exploring the exposure region with cumulative doses of >350 mGy at this low-dose-rates.

Indexed as

biological benefitdosedose ratehormesis-coupled LNT theoryradiation hormesis

Identifiers

PMID42571154
PMCPMC13451670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.