ArticleCognitive neurodynamics2026
Acetylcholine enhances deviance detection in Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal networks.
Article in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain's ability to detect unexpected events, deviance detection (DD), is critical for survival. While DD has been computationally explained by synaptic plasticity, the role of neuromodulators such as acetylcholine (ACh) remains less understood. Here, we examine how ACh modulates DD. Using a cholinergic-sensitive Hodgkin-Huxley network of 200 neurons arranged in 2D space and stimulated via five spatially distinct inputs (A-E), we implemented an oddball paradigm with three conditions: standard (80% A, 20% B), deviant (20% A, 80% B), and a multi-standard control (20% each of A-E). ACh levels were modeled by varying the conductance of a slow K⁺ current, reflecting cholinergic modulation of the M-current. In the absence of ACh, the network already exhibited DD, responding more strongly to deviant A compared to control A. Notably, introducing a small amount of ACh amplified DD, while further increases suppressed it. Maximal DD occurred when strong spike frequency adaptation to standard B reduced competition, and enhanced phase-locking synchronized the network's response to deviant A. These findings reveal how neuromodulation can shape context-sensitive neural computation, optimizing detection of salient events through a dynamic balance of suppression and synchronization. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-026-10522-3.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.