Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571111›Full record

ArticleVideo journal of sports medicine

Focalplasty for Resurfacing of Focal Articular Lesions of the Medial Femoral Condyle.

Napatpong Thamrongskulsiri, Andres Valdivia San Roman, Logan D Moews, Tomas F Vega, Felipe Casanova, Jacob T Morgan, Tanner Nishioka, Jorge Chahla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Video journal of sports medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Napatpong ThamrongskulsiriDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7045-3222
Andres Valdivia San RomanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Logan D MoewsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Tomas F VegaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1083-6329
Felipe CasanovaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jacob T MorganDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3734-6584
Tanner NishiokaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Focal osteochondral defects of the knee are difficult to manage, as untreated lesions may progress to early osteoarthritis. The OvertureTi Knee Resurfacing System is designed to treat focal defects while preserving native bone, cartilage, and soft tissue. Indications: Focalplasty is indicated in patients with compartmentalized cartilage lesions, preserved ligamentous stability, and meniscal integrity or repairable tears. Appropriate alignment, joint space preservation, and minimal osteophyte formation are required. Technique Description: The procedure began with arthroscopic repair of the medial meniscus root using a transtibial pull-out technique. Following this, an open approach was performed to expose the medial femoral condyle. The chondral defect was sized, and appropriate instrumentation was used to prepare the site. Cartilage scoring and sequential reaming were performed to achieve the desired depth and contour. Trial components were confirmed to fit and position, after which peg holes were drilled and filled with bone cement. Finally, the oblong OvertureTi femoral implant was seated flush with the surrounding cartilage surface, and standard wound closure was completed. Results: At 2 weeks, radiographs confirmed proper implant positioning. Long-term outcomes of the Overture prosthesis are not yet available. However, studies on similar implants, such as the HemiCAP, have reported improved function and survivorship at mid- to long-term follow-up. Discussion/Conclusions: The Overture prosthesis offers advantages over arthroplasty and biologic resurfacing, including lower cost, off-the-shelf availability, preservation of native tissues, and bone conservation for future arthroplasty. Larger prospective studies are required to determine its long-term clinical efficacy. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Indexed as

cartilagefocalplastyjoint preservationknee

Identifiers

PMID42571111
PMCPMC13451671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.