Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42571072›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of wildlife research2026

Technical note: examining the response of a large carnivore (

Anna Rouviere, Julius Muge, Graeme D Ruxton, Robert A Montgomery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of wildlife research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna RouviereDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6827-8370
Julius MugeDepartment of Zoology, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Graeme D RuxtonSchool of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8943-6609
Robert A MontgomeryDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5894-0589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal dummies (sometimes called decoys or models) are widely used in ecological research to investigate predation, sexual selection, or social communication. The use of this method, however, is generally limited to small-bodied taxa, especially in predation studies. Yet, dummy prey could prove useful in understanding large carnivore behaviour, especially in situations where real-time observations and experimental approaches may be difficult. It is not known whether and to what extent large carnivores will recognise dummy prey as realistic in field experiments, which may hinder the development and funding of research using this method. In this study, we presented African lions ( Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10344-026-02135-2.

Indexed as

BehaviourDecoyFake preyField methodModelStalking

Identifiers

PMID42571072
PMCPMC13451379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.