ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Salinity stress and drought stress differentially affect biomass allocation, leaf orientation and performance of two sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDrought and salinity stresses are major and interrelated threats to crop productivity in arid lands. Understanding the mechanisms of tolerance to salinity and drought stresses is critical for selection of productive crop cultivars.
methodsThis work investigates the differential impact of salinity and drought stresses on growth and performance of Sohag 1 (Sohg) and Shandaweel 3 (Shnd) cultivars of sesame at the same water potential (0, -100, -250 and - 450 kPa) and nutrient supply in a hydroponic sand culture. Plant response to stress was evaluated in terms of growth and biomass fractionation, leaf orientation and gas exchange as well as the contents and fractionation of leaf photosynthetic pigments and carbohydrates.
resultsThe horizontal leaf orientation of Shnd was marginally affected by stress; meanwhile, the vertical leaves of Sohg became more vertical under salinity stress but less vertical under drought stress. Foliage of the two sesame cultivars was more tolerant to salt stress than to drought stress, with better tolerance of Shnd than Sohg. This was evident from the progressive drought-induced inhibition of foliage growth versus a mild retardation or even benefit by low salinity, along with slightly less severe effect of high salinity. Salinity targeted particularly root growth with favored biomass allocation to the foliage. By contrast, the enhancement of root growth and retardation of foliage growth under drought implies favored biomass allocation to root. Salinity reduced leaf pigment content in the two cultivars, particularly Sohg but drought either increased it or was without effect. Stress, post a threshold of -100 kPa, reduced stomatal conductance, the rates of photosynthesis and transpiration and water use efficiency, with stronger impact of salinity than drought. The lowering in leaf carbohydrate content was more aggressive under salinity than under drought, and was associated with increasing proportion of pectin at the expense of starch but variable changes in soluble sugars.
conclusionSalinity and drought stresses, at equivalent water potentials, differentially affect sesame growth, gas exchange, leaf orientation, photosynthetic pigments and carbohydrate fractions in a genotype-dependent pattern. Among the two investigated sesame cultivars, Shnd seems more stress-tolerant than Sohg. The present findings, obtained from a hydroponic sand culture under partially protected conditions, needs further evaluation under field conditions employing wider collection of genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.