ArticleBMC biomedical engineering2026
Integrating statistical parametric mapping, functional principal component analysis, explainable machine learning, and equivalence testing for multimodal gait signal analysis.
Article in BMC biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGait speed is a key clinical indicator in neurological and orthopaedic conditions, yet waveform-level adaptations in ground reaction forces (GRF) and multi-muscle electromyography (EMG) remain poorly characterised. Existing approaches often analyse discrete outcomes or individual modalities, leaving limited integration of continuous waveform inference, dimensionality reduction, explainable machine learning, and equivalence testing within a unified multimodal framework.
objectiveTo compare three-axis GRF and six-muscle EMG between slow (0.5 m/s) and fast (1.0 m/s) treadmill walking using statistical parametric mapping (SPM), functional principal component analysis (fPCA), explainable machine learning, and equivalence testing.
methodsFifty-eight healthy adults were analysed (55 with complete EMG). Paired SPM with cluster-based permutation assessed waveform differences. fPCA-derived features entered a Random Forest with leave-one-subject-out cross-validation and SHAP interpretability. Two one-sided tests (TOST) assessed equivalence of the vertical GRF.
resultsNo significant cluster-level SPM differences were found for any GRF component. In contrast, significant EMG clusters were detected in tibialis anterior (ten clusters), gastrocnemius medial and lateral, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, and semitendinosus. The Random Forest achieved 87.2% accuracy (95% CI: 79.3-92.3%), improving 14.7% points over simple amplitude features, with tibialis anterior PC1 the most important predictor. TOST did not confirm equivalence within ± 0.2 N/kg, though no GRF clusters appeared.
conclusionsModerate speed increases elicited distributed multi-muscle activation changes, whereas GRF waveform differences did not reach cluster-level significance within the present analytical framework. The integrated SPM-fPCA-SHAP-TOST pipeline provides an interpretable signal-processing framework for multimodal gait analysis and could serve as a foundation for future investigations in rehabilitation engineering, digital biomarkers, and wearable sensing, pending validation in clinical populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.