ArticleBMC health services research2026
Determinants of mammography screening uptake among women attending family health centers in Ankara, Türkiye: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to assess sociodemographic characteristics, health-seeking behaviors, and breast cancer screening beliefs among women aged 18-69 years attending Family Health Centers (FHCs) in Ankara, Türkiye, and to determine predictors of participation in mammography screening. It is design as a descriptive, cross-sectional study.
methodsBetween April 2024 and January 2025, data were collected from 718 women using a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Turkish-adapted Breast Cancer Screening Beliefs Scale (originally developed by Kwok et al., validated by Türkoğlu et al.). Descriptive analyses, Chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression were performed with IBM SPSS 25.0. Variables with p < 0.20 in univariate analyses were entered into multivariate modeling, and statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
resultsStatistically significant differences were found between age groups in terms of marital status, education level, housing situation, presence of chronic disease, general health perception, and history of non-breast cancer screening (p < 0.001). According to the logistic regression analysis, women who are aware of screening programs are 8.50 times more likely to have a mammogram, those who have undergone non-breast cancer screening are 5.52 times more likely, those with chronic diseases are 1.98 times more likely, and those who describe their health perception as "good/very good" are 1.90 times more likely. (Nagelkerke R² = 0.465).
conclusionMammography participation is influenced by both structural and personal determinants. Enhancing awareness, strengthening primary-care education, and addressing financial barriers could substantially improve screening uptake and facilitate earlier breast cancer diagnosis among Turkish women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.