ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026
Scoring Algorithms to Optimize Viewing Time Measures of Sexual Interest in Children.
Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Viewing times (VTs) are established indirect measures of sexual interests. They are based on the effect that stimuli of sexually attractive target groups are scrutinized longer than stimuli of non-attractive groups in sexual attractiveness rating tasks. When assessing sexual interest in children and adults, decision latencies for target sexual maturity categories are typically compared by subtracting average latencies for children from average latencies of adults. In this study, several ways of improving the scoring algorithm were explored (e.g., using standardized differences, excluding the longest VTs of each category from the scoring, or conducting a profile analysis based on peaks in certain target categories). Scoring algorithms were compared in terms of reliability, convergent validity, and the influence of confounding variables in a secondary analysis of a German male community sample (N = 8554). Additionally, the influence of the scoring on the number of participants who would be classified as exhibiting (increased levels of) sexual interest in children was investigated. The VT task's validity proved to be quite robust to changes in scoring, but the reliability and classification proportions differed substantially between scores. The best performing score was the mean difference of adult and child target groups with the exclusion of the longest VT in each target category. The results imply that the scoring approach should be chosen based on the research or diagnostic goal of using the VT task (e.g., whether one prioritizes sensitivity or specificity). The study underlines the influence of measurement and scoring approach on prevalence estimates of (increased) sexual interest in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.