Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570996›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Scoring Algorithms to Optimize Viewing Time Measures of Sexual Interest in Children.

Lilli Meißner, Alexander F Schmidt, Rainer Banse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lilli Meißner *Social and Legal Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, D-53111, Bonn, Germany. lilli.meissner@uni-bonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-8078-8466
Alexander F Schmidt *Social and Legal Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6449-2946
Rainer BanseSocial and Legal Psychology, Institute of Psychology, Rhenish Friedrich Wilhelm University of Bonn, Kaiser-Karl-Ring 9, D-53111, Bonn, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8817-9994

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Viewing times (VTs) are established indirect measures of sexual interests. They are based on the effect that stimuli of sexually attractive target groups are scrutinized longer than stimuli of non-attractive groups in sexual attractiveness rating tasks. When assessing sexual interest in children and adults, decision latencies for target sexual maturity categories are typically compared by subtracting average latencies for children from average latencies of adults. In this study, several ways of improving the scoring algorithm were explored (e.g., using standardized differences, excluding the longest VTs of each category from the scoring, or conducting a profile analysis based on peaks in certain target categories). Scoring algorithms were compared in terms of reliability, convergent validity, and the influence of confounding variables in a secondary analysis of a German male community sample (N = 8554). Additionally, the influence of the scoring on the number of participants who would be classified as exhibiting (increased levels of) sexual interest in children was investigated. The VT task's validity proved to be quite robust to changes in scoring, but the reliability and classification proportions differed substantially between scores. The best performing score was the mean difference of adult and child target groups with the exclusion of the longest VT in each target category. The results imply that the scoring approach should be chosen based on the research or diagnostic goal of using the VT task (e.g., whether one prioritizes sensitivity or specificity). The study underlines the influence of measurement and scoring approach on prevalence estimates of (increased) sexual interest in children.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSexual BehaviorAdolescentAdultChildHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultDSM-5PedohebephiliaPedophiliaPenile plethsymographySexual interestViewing time

Identifiers

PMID42570996
PMCPMC13597560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.