Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570980›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Do not smile when acquiring consumer selfies for multi-attribute skin profiling and baseline deep learning evaluation.

Dennis Hartmann, Dominik Müller, Florian Auer, Gabriele Marie Lehner, Laura Gockeln, Anna Rottenkolber, Gabriel Duttler, Julia Welzel, Frank Kramer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dennis HartmannIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany. Dennis.Hartmann@informatik.uni-augsburg.de.
Dominik MüllerIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Florian AuerIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Gabriele Marie LehnerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Laura GockelnDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Anna RottenkolberGrandel the Beautyness Company, Augsburg, Germany.
Gabriel DuttlerGrandel the Beautyness Company, Augsburg, Germany.
Julia WelzelDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Frank KramerIT-Infrastructure for Translational Medical Research, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing demand for personalized skincare solutions highlights a significant gap: many consumers struggle to find suitable products without professional guidance. While the commercial potential for tailored product recommendations is vast, a key challenge remains the lack of effective methods for skin profiling via image classification. To address this challenge, this paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark dataset of 3203 standardized facial consumer selfies, annotated across eight primary cosmetic skin features. We establish a transparent baseline evaluation utilizing the open-source medical image classification framework AUCMEDI. A variety of deep learning architectures were trained to recognize and classify various skin features, including sagging skin, wrinkles, under-eye circles, redness, shine, pigment spots, acne, and pore size. The baseline model's performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (e), which appropriately accounts for the ordinal distance in cosmetic grading. Utilizing standard deep learning architectures, the baseline benchmark established promising performance in structural categories like sagging skin ([Formula: see text]) and wrinkles ([Formula: see text]). While achieving satisfactory results for under-eye circles ([Formula: see text]), redness ([Formula: see text]), and shine ([Formula: see text]), the baseline models encountered significant architectural limitations when resolving highly localized or imbalanced features such as acne ([Formula: see text]), pore size ([Formula: see text]), and pigment spots ([Formula: see text]), the latter three underperforming a trivial constant-mean predictor.

Indexed as

CosmeticsDeep LearningSkinSkin AgingSmilingFaceHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedCosmeticsBiomedical image classificationMedical image analysis

Identifiers

PMID42570980
PMCPMC13452802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.