ArticleScientific reports2026
Do not smile when acquiring consumer selfies for multi-attribute skin profiling and baseline deep learning evaluation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The increasing demand for personalized skincare solutions highlights a significant gap: many consumers struggle to find suitable products without professional guidance. While the commercial potential for tailored product recommendations is vast, a key challenge remains the lack of effective methods for skin profiling via image classification. To address this challenge, this paper introduces a comprehensive benchmark dataset of 3203 standardized facial consumer selfies, annotated across eight primary cosmetic skin features. We establish a transparent baseline evaluation utilizing the open-source medical image classification framework AUCMEDI. A variety of deep learning architectures were trained to recognize and classify various skin features, including sagging skin, wrinkles, under-eye circles, redness, shine, pigment spots, acne, and pore size. The baseline model's performance was evaluated using the mean absolute error (e), which appropriately accounts for the ordinal distance in cosmetic grading. Utilizing standard deep learning architectures, the baseline benchmark established promising performance in structural categories like sagging skin ([Formula: see text]) and wrinkles ([Formula: see text]). While achieving satisfactory results for under-eye circles ([Formula: see text]), redness ([Formula: see text]), and shine ([Formula: see text]), the baseline models encountered significant architectural limitations when resolving highly localized or imbalanced features such as acne ([Formula: see text]), pore size ([Formula: see text]), and pigment spots ([Formula: see text]), the latter three underperforming a trivial constant-mean predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.