Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570963›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluating clinical and neuroimaging predictors for cognitive-behavioral therapy outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Marija Tochadse, Julia Klawohn, Christian Kaufmann, Rosa Grützmann, Anja Riesel, Stephan Heinzel, Roshan Prakash Rane, Sofia Pereira da Silva, Sarah Wellan, Sam Gijsen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marija TochadseDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. marija.tochadse@charite.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8576-6571
Julia KlawohnDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian KaufmannDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rosa GrützmannDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anja RieselDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stephan HeinzelDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Roshan Prakash RaneDepartment of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sofia Pereira da SilvaBernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Berlin, Germany.
Sarah WellanDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (corporate member of Freie Universität at Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health), Berlin, Germany.
Sam GijsenHertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Kerstin Ritter *Hertie Institute for AI in Brain Health, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Norbert Kathmann *Department of Psychology, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is the first-line treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), yet a significant number of patients do not achieve remission or substantial symptom relief. This study aims to enhance the prediction of CBT outcomes in OCD by integrating demographic, clinical, and neuroimaging data using machine learning (ML) models. We conduct a comprehensive analysis on a well-characterized clinical sample, employing a rigorous validation scheme to avoid data leakage, and comparing multiple ML algorithms to minimize bias. Out of four different ML models trained on demographic and clinical data, structural MRI, and resting-state MRI functional connectivity data, no model was able to predict CBT success significantly above chance level in the present sample. Although clinical and demographic data enabled 64%-66% accuracy for predicting remission, this did not reach statistical significance after permutation testing. Pre-treatment symptom severity emerged numerically as the most promising predictor of remission, aligning with previous studies, but did not pass the significance threshold in the present study. Despite efforts to identify neuroimaging predictors, neither functional nor structural MRI features significantly contributed to the prediction models. These findings suggest that robust, individualized brain-based predictions for mental health outcomes remain challenging with the available data and sample size.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyNeuroimagingObsessive-Compulsive DisorderAdultBrainFemaleHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePredictive Learning ModelsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)Functional connectivityMachine Learning (ML)Neuroimaging predictorsObsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD)Outcome prediction

Identifiers

PMID42570963
PMCPMC13452815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.