ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
DeepACPred: an integrated multistage framework for anticancer peptide discovery and activity prediction.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence accelerates anticancer peptides (ACPs) discovery. However, existing computational methods lack integration of identification with activity-based candidate prioritization. Here, we present DeepACPred, a three-stage pipeline encompassing ACP binary classification model, ACP multilabel classification model, and ACP IC50 prediction model, leveraging multimodal features from ESM2 protein language model embeddings, AAindex physicochemical descriptors, and sequence composition. On 5712 benchmark sequences, the binary classifier achieved 95.10% accuracy (AUC = 0.9913), with performance remaining stable under CD-HIT cluster-aware splitting at 40%-90% identity thresholds. Multilabel cancer-type prediction yielded macro-F1 = 0.9124 across seven cancer types, and log10(IC50) regression achieved Spearman ρ = 0.8602 under 5-fold cross-validation. Ablation experiments showed task-dependent feature contributions rather than uniformly additive multimodal effects. Applied to 260 000 motif-enriched 18-mer candidates, DeepACPred selected 12 peptides predicted to be active against breast cancer cells, all of which showed measurable in vitro cytotoxic activity against murine 4T1 cells in OD-derived dose-response assays (IC50: 0.88-36.83 μg/ml). Although prospective IC50 ranking showed limited fine-grained resolution, these results support the use of the regression module for coarse candidate enrichment. In conclusion, DeepACPred provides a systematic framework for ACP candidate enrichment and prioritization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.