Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570328›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026

Head Acceleration Event Probabilities During Standardised Contact Drills in Academy Men's Rugby League.

Ryan White, Daniel Weaving, Cameron Owen, Greg Roe, Thomas Sawczuk, James Tooby, Gemma Phillips, Dane Vishnubala, Paul Anderson, Ben Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryan WhiteCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3656-8450
Daniel WeavingCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Cameron OwenCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6518-1389
Greg RoeCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1428-9282
Thomas SawczukCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-132X
James ToobyCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5398-4416
Gemma PhillipsCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Dane VishnubalaRugby Football League, Manchester, UK.
Paul AndersonRugby Football League, Manchester, UK.
Ben JonesCarnegie Applied Rugby Research (CARR) Centre, Carnegie School of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4274-6236

Funding

Prevent BiometricsRugby Football League
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated head acceleration event (HAE) probabilities between common contact-drills in rugby league. Fifteen professional male academy players participated in three training sessions, completing standardised contact-drills while wearing custom-fitted iMGs, all sessions were filmed. HAE data (peak linear acceleration and peak angular acceleration) were captured, synchronised, and processed alongside video data. Binomial logistic regression and ordinal mixed-effect regression models were used to calculate overall and exceedance probabilities. Data included 1402 (93 ± 50 per player) contact-drill observations, of which 133 had HAEs ≥ 5 g (9 ± 8 per player). Substantial variability in probability for HAEs ≥ 5 g (1.3%-41.3%) was observed across drills. Standing wrestle had the highest HAE ≥ 5 g probability (41.3%; CI: 31.0%-52.3%), while tackle shield hits at 1 m had the lowest (1.3%; CI: 0.5%-3.4%). HAE probability was greater for tacklers than ball-carriers. Overall, probability of a HAE ≥ 25 g was < 1.1%. Standardised contact-drills varied in HAE probabilities, but chances of higher magnitude HAEs was low for all drills. Overall, the probability of a HAE during standardised contact-drills was low, although practitioners should consider the differences (i.e., the variability) in HAE probabilities when managing HAE training exposure.

Indexed as

AccelerationFootballHeadAdultBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansMaleProbabilityYoung Adulthead‐acceleration‐eventinstrumented mouthguardsmicrotechnology

Identifiers

PMID42570328
PMCPMC13452681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.