ArticleTree physiology2026
Nutrient-mediated tree growth responses are governed by internal resource allocation: intra-organ water-carbon trade-offs and inter-organ carbon concentration gradient.
Article in Tree physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Nutrient deposition is reshaping forest productivity, yet the physiological mechanisms linking nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) enhancement to tree growth remain incompletely resolved. We propose that internal resource allocation strategies-specifically intra-organ trade-offs between water and carbohydrate resources and inter-organ carbohydrate concentration gradient-mediate nutrient-driven tree growth responses. Using a long-term fertilization experiment in subtropical Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook. plantations, we measured relative water content (RWC) and traditional resource concentrations [soluble sugar (SS) concentration; starch (ST) concentration] during drought season. We rank-transformed RWC, SS and ST within each organ type across all samples. Intra-organ water-carbon trade-offs were quantified as two normalized ratios: ln(RWCrank/SSrank) for RWC:SS and ln(RWCrank/STrank) for RWC:ST, where higher values indicate greater solute dependence for turgor maintenance or greater ST storage volume fraction, respectively. The inter-organ carbon concentration gradient was quantified as differences in SS or ST between leaves and twigs (SSleaf-twig, STleaf-twig); and between absorptive roots and transport roots. We demonstrated three key nutrient-specific responses: (i) N addition promoted transport root ln(RWCrank/SSrank) while enhancing leaf ln(RWCrank/STrank), amplifying STleaf-twig; (ii) P addition reduced leaf and twig ln(RWCrank/SSrank) and (iii) combined N+P addition reduced twig ln(RWCrank/SSrank), while increasing leaf and twig ln(RWCrank/STrank). These reorganization patterns had direct growth consequences: while traditional resource concentrations explained 26.0% of growth variation, incorporating derived attributes increased explanatory power by 43.5% (to 37.3% total variance explained). Notably, the twig ln(RWCrank/STrank) emerged as the single strongest growth predictor, where N+P induced ST dominance correlated with enhanced growth rate. Nitrogen enrichment enhanced SS dominance in transport roots, a pattern that may occur at the expense of stem growth. Our results establish an internal resource allocation framework that mechanistically links nutrient-mediated carbon management patterns to forest productivity under global change, revealing how N+P co-enrichment synergistically optimizes carbon resource storage and utilization beyond single-nutrient effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.