Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570162›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

The Implications of Lipoprotein(a) in MASLD.

Nandini Avula, Zain Zaidi, Anurag Mehta

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nandini AvulaDepartment of Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zain ZaidiEmory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Anurag MehtaEmory Clinical Cardiovascular Research Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, 57 Executive Park Drive NE, Suite 400, Atlanta, GA, 30329, USA. anurag.mehta@emory.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewLipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] remains a well-established, genetically determined predictor of cardiovascular risk due to its pro-atherogenic and pro-thrombotic effects. This review examines the paradoxical relationship between Lp(a) and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), where Lp(a) levels decline with advanced fibrosis despite persistently elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. RECENT

findingsStudies consistently show an inverse association between Lp(a) and MASLD severity. Evidence suggests that lower Lp(a) levels are a consequence of hepatic dysfunction rather than protective against cardiovascular disease. Additionally, selective hepatic insulin resistance increases VLDL production, diverting apoB100 from Lp(a) assembly, while insulin directly suppresses apolipoprotein(a) synthesis. Genetic variants linked to MASLD may further impair hepatic lipid secretion and reduce Lp(a). Lower Lp(a) levels in MASLD likely reflect impaired hepatic synthetic function rather than reduced cardiovascular risk. Recognizing this paradox may improve risk stratification and interpretation of Lp(a) in patients with MASLD.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesFatty LiverLipoprotein(a)Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseHumansInsulin ResistanceLiverRisk FactorsLipoprotein(a)Lipoprotein(a)Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.