ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Predictive pre-resection robotic ligament balancing in total knee arthroplasty is accurate across surgeons and patient factors.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technology enables force-controlled pre-resection joint gap assessment. Its accuracy across surgeons and patient factors remains unknown. This study evaluated how accurately this technology achieved planned joint gaps and whether accuracy was influenced by surgeon, preoperative deformity, sex, BMI, and age. Six hundred seventy-two consecutive robotic TKAs from five surgeons were retrospectively reviewed. A robotic ligament tensioner applied 70-100 N medially and laterally before bony resections. Mean (ME) and mean absolute (MAE) predicted gap errors (final minus planned) were calculated at 10°, 45°, and 90° flexion. Linear regression evaluated associations between error and preoperative alignment and sex. A sub-analysis included BMI and age. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests compared errors between surgeons and deformity groups. Overall, MAE was 1.1 mm medially and 1.3 mm laterally. The largest ME occurred laterally in flexion in varus knees (-0.7 mm; tighter than plan), and laterally in extension in valgus knees (0.6 mm; looser than plan). Extension errors were similar in flexion-contracture and sagittal-neutral knees (ME within ± 0.1 mm), while hyper-extended knees were 0.5 mm looser than planned. Increasing BMI was associated with lateral flexion gap tightening (-0.59 mm per 10 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.