ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026
Pulsed Radiofrequency for Post-Stroke Complications: From Neuromodulation to Functional Recovery.
Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review synthesizes the mechanisms, applications, and evidence gaps regarding pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in the rehabilitation of post-stroke complications to guide its standardized integration. RECENT
findingsPRF, a minimally invasive neuromodulation technique, modulates neuronal excitability without thermal damage. Emerging evidence highlights multi-target effects, including improved microcirculation, suppressed neuroinflammation, and regulated neurotrophic factors. Clinically, PRF effectively alleviates refractory post-stroke pain and may indirectly ameliorate post-stroke depression while facilitating motor recovery. Image-guided procedures targeting specific nerves demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Despite promising outcomes for stroke rehabilitation, current evidence relies primarily on small case series and preclinical studies. Significant gaps remain in standardized protocols and high-quality randomized controlled trials. Further validation of long-term efficacy and safety is essential to establish PRF's definitive role in comprehensive post-stroke management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42570137What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.