ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Effects of different volumes of a water-soluble and biodegradable nesting material on behavior, pain, glycemia, farrowing traits, and performance in crated sows.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study evaluated the effects of providing 3-15 kg of a soluble and biodegradable biopolymer-based enrichment material (blend of biodegradable polymers and natural fibers) to prepartum sows housed in farrowing crates. Fifteen sows were blocked by body weight and backfat thickness and assigned to three treatments: no enrichment material (CONT), 3 kg of enrichment material (BN3), or 15 kg of enrichment material with added nutritional value (BN15; 14.50 MJ ME/kg; composition: a blend of biodegradable natural polymers and natural fibers). The material was supplied 24 h before the expected farrowing date. Behavioral observations were performed during the 18 h preceding farrowing. Sow and piglet blood glucose concentrations were determined from venipuncture of auricular vein. Pain-related facial expressions, piglet birth intervals, and litter performance parameters were also evaluated. Behavioral analysis revealed significant differences between treated and control sows, with BN3 and BN15 sows showing reduced ventral lying, redirected nest-building behaviors, floor interaction, and postural changes during the pre-farrowing period (p < 0.05). A quadratic relationship was observed between piglet birth order and birth interval (p < 0.001), birth interval was longer early in parturition, decreased in the middle stages, and increased at the end of parturition. In addition, compared with CONT sows, BN15 sows provided exhibited shorter birth intervals (p = 0.030), while BN3 sows showed a tendency toward shorter birth intervals (p = 0.084). Sows in BN15 tended to have higher glycemia at farrowing onset than CONT (96.6 vs. 80.2 mg/dL; p = 0.022). Piglets from BN3 and BN15 tended to have higher birth glycemia than CONT (44.06 and 43.79 vs. 37.92 mg/dL; p < 0.10). Pain scores assessed through facial expressions/grimace score were lower (p < 0.10) in BN3 and BN15 than in CONT between 120 and 240 min after farrowing onset. Overall, providing biopolymer-based enrichment material, improved behavioral and physiological indicators associated with sow welfare.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.