ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2026
Analyzing audience participation at the 43rd workshop of the german surgical working group on endocrinology (CAEK): gender balance in academic discussion dynamics in endocrine surgery.
Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlthough many surgical fields remain male dominated, the rising number of female medical students and physicians raises important questions about engagement dynamics within academic and professional settings. Endocrine Surgery (ES) currently demonstrates high rates of female representation among its fellows all over the world. This study examines gender differences in audience participation at the 43rd Workshop of the Surgical Working Group on Endocrinology (CAEK).
methodsLecture sessions of the 43rd Workshop of the CAEK were prospectively observed and analyzed. The study recorded the gender appearance of chairs, speakers, participants asking the first question following each lecture and whether this influenced subsequent audience participation. Gender distributions among attendees and question patterns were compared.
resultsA total of 385 participants (52% female, 48% male) attended the conference. 37 sessions were included. Overall, 63 questions were recorded. 34 (54%) came from women and 29 (46%) from men. The first question was posed by a male participant in 14 sessions (51.9%) and by a female participant in 13 sessions (48.1%). When discussion was started by a man, 65.9% of subsequent questions came from other men. 90.9% of follow-up questions came from women, when discussion was opened by another woman.
conclusionFemale participation at the 43rd Workshop CAEK was well balanced, although the gender of the first questioner influenced subsequent audience engagement, as observed in other studies. These findings suggest equitable academic engagement in endocrine surgery in Germany, while indicating that the gender of the first questioner is associated with subsequent audience participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.