Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570115›Full record

ReviewPlanta2026

The zig-zag model of molecular defense and counterdefense in plant-herbivore interactions.

Prakash Kolanchi, Murugan Marimuthu, Punya Nachappa, Vamsi Nalam

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Prakash KolanchiDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Murugan MarimuthuDepartment of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India. muruganmarimuthu@tnau.ac.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7485-1153
Punya NachappaDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA.
Vamsi NalamDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA. Vams.Nalam@colostate.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionPlant-herbivore interactions follow zig-zag-like cycles in which herbivore- and damage-derived cues activate conserved defense signaling hubs, while insect effectors suppress or redirect these pathways, creating recurrent molecular bottlenecks that shape plant resistance. Plant-herbivore interactions are orchestrated through a dynamic molecular dialogue at the feeding interface, wherein insect attack triggers the generation of damage-derived signals from plant tissues and herbivore-derived signals from oral or salivary secretions. These cues can activate plant defense by sensing the damage- and herbivore-associated molecular patterns; however, they may also be mitigated by salivary effectors that suppress, redirect, or modulate host defense signaling. This review examines how plants interpret herbivory to synthesize defense decisions through receptor-mediated recognition, calcium and reactive oxygen species dynamics, membrane depolarization, mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling, and downstream hormonal integration, with a particular focus on the crosstalk among jasmonate, salicylic acid, and ethylene pathways. Additionally, we highlighted how insect-derived elicitors and effectors repeatedly converge on a limited set of defense-regulatory bottlenecks, including receptor proximal signaling, hormonal balance, callose deposition, and cell death-associated defense responses. Rather than categorizing elicitors and effectors as fixed molecular entities, we underscore that their biological significance is often context-dependent and influenced by host species, feeding mode, associated microbes, and the temporal dynamics of attack. Collectively, these patterns portray plant-insect interactions as a coevolutionary process involving signal generation, interpretation, and counterdefense. A comprehensive understanding of this molecular dialogue will facilitate the identification of key control points in defense and support the development of durable, ecologically informed strategies to enhance crop resistance against pests.

Indexed as

HerbivoryPlant Defense Against HerbivoryPlantsAnimalsCyclopentanesEthylenesInnate Immunity RecognitionInsectaOxylipinsPlant Growth RegulatorsReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionCyclopentanesethyleneEthylenesOxylipinsPlant Growth RegulatorsReactive Oxygen SpeciesDual functional moleculeEarly and late defensesEffectorElicitor

Identifiers

PMID42570115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.