Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570113›Full record

ArticlePsychological research2026

The space of words: semantic integration of space-related words in noun sensorimotor processing.

Gioacchino Garofalo, Lucia Riggio, Francesco Bianchini, Elena Gherri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gioacchino GarofaloDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 38, Bologna, 40126, Italy. gioacchino.garofalo@unibo.it.
Lucia RiggioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery- Unit of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Via Volturno 39, Parma, 43125, Italy.
Francesco BianchiniDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 38, Bologna, 40126, Italy.
Elena GherriDepartment of Philosophy, University of Bologna, Via Zamboni 38, Bologna, 40126, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the processing of graspable object nouns elicits specific motor programs related to potential hand-object interactions. Notably, adjectives specifying manipulative features of these objects are integrated into this sensorimotor representation. In the present study, three experiments were conducted to explore the impact of spatial adjectives denoting the position of the object in space on the sensorimotor representation of graspable object nouns. We used a reach-to-grasp compatibility task, in which participants had to categorize object nouns as artifact or natural, by performing either a power or a precision reach-to-grasp movement matching or not the typical grip associated with the object. On each trial the object noun was presented with a second word specifying the location of the object in space (e.g. near vs. far). In addition, using the same task, we explore also the impact of a different class of words on the object sensorimotor representation that are spatial demonstratives (i.e., this and that) In all experiments, a reliable grasp compatibility effect emerged. The grasp-compatibility effect was modulated differentially by spatial adjectives and spatial demonstratives, revealing not only that both elements are integrated into the noun sensorimotor representation, but also that these different word categories lead to different spatial representations of the object during the semantic processing of object-related words combinations.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceSemanticsSpace PerceptionAdultFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42570113
PMCPMC13452750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.