ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
Surgical management and postoperative imaging assessment of hallux valgus.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hallux valgus (HV) is a common and complex three-dimensional deformity of the first ray, resulting from multifactorial interactions involving anatomical, biomechanical, ligamentous, muscular, and extrinsic factors. The absence of a single etiological mechanism explains the wide variety of proposed surgical techniques and highlights the need for individualized management. The therapeutic strategy is based on a structured radioclinical weight-bearing assessment integrating angular parameters, first-ray stability, sesamoid alignment, and joint status. Depending on the severity of the deformity and the presence of associated instability, surgical options include distal, diaphyseal, or proximal osteotomies, Lapidus tarsometatarsal arthrodesis, and metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis. Certain complex situations, particularly those associated with metatarsus adductus or juvenile HV, require specific morphological analysis because of an increased risk of recurrence and particular biomechanical constraints. Postoperative imaging plays a central role in the assessment of surgical outcomes. It allows evaluation of deformity correction, osteotomy healing, fixation stability, sesamoid repositioning, and restoration of first-ray alignment. Weight-bearing radiographs remain the reference examination, whereas WBCT enables a more precise three-dimensional analysis of rotational correction, first metatarsal pronation, and the sesamoid complex. Imaging is also essential for the detection of postoperative complications, including recurrence, malunion, nonunion, avascular necrosis, transfer metatarsalgia, infection, osteoarthritis, and nerve injury. WBCT currently represents a major complementary tool for the analysis of multiplanar corrections and their biomechanical consequences. Thorough knowledge of normal and pathological postoperative findings is essential to optimize the management of HV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.