Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42570111›Full record

ReviewNeuroradiology2026

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: imaging features, clinical relevance, and a proposal for standardized MRI reporting.

Omar Andres Pantoja-Burbano, María Tugores-Garcías, Valeria Richart, Andrés Felipe Mejía-León, José Maidana-Guanes, Rodrigo Sutil Berjón, Santiago Aristizabal-Ortiz, Mario Mahecha-Carvajal, David Timaran-Montenegro, Roy Riascos

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Omar Andres Pantoja-BurbanoPontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4126-9340
María Tugores-GarcíasHospital Universitario Son Espases, Palma, Spain.
Valeria RichartHospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Andrés Felipe Mejía-LeónFundación Cardio Infantil - LaCardio, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-4963
José Maidana-GuanesUniversidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8216-2640
Rodrigo Sutil BerjónMarqués de Valdecilla University Hospital, Santander, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-1364-4561
Santiago Aristizabal-OrtizThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5682-5541
Mario Mahecha-CarvajalThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-8698
David Timaran-MontenegroThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6956-618X
Roy RiascosThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, United States. roy.f.riascos@uth.tmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3081-0413

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are a heterogeneous group of lesions redefined in the 2022 WHO classification, emphasizing their neuroendocrine nature and biological variability. Despite advances in imaging, radiological reporting of PitNETs remains inconsistent and lacks standardized descriptors. This review aims to summarize the main updates of the 2022 WHO classification and to propose a structured MRI-based reporting framework.

methodsA comprehensive literature review was conducted focusing on the 2022 WHO classification and radiological features of PitNETs. Imaging parameters were analyzed to identify reproducible descriptors relevant to tumor morphology, internal composition, enhancement characteristics, and invasion patterns. These parameters were organized into a categorical model analogous to the VASARI framework.

resultsThe proposed model includes 19 standardized MRI descriptors designed to capture key imaging features of PitNETs. Each parameter can be scored categorically to promote consistent interpretation, facilitate multicenter data comparison, and support radiologic-pathologic correlation. The system provides a reproducible structure for reporting that integrates seamlessly with the diagnostic and prognostic context of the 2022 WHO classification.

conclusionThe proposed standardized reporting framework introduces 19 reproducible MRI descriptors that collectively address tumor localization, internal composition, enhancement characteristics, and invasion patterns. Beyond their descriptive value, each parameter carries potential clinical implications for tumor subtype identification, surgical approach planning, prediction of resectability, and assessment of prognosis. By providing a structured reporting system aligned with the 2022 WHO classification, this framework has the potential to enhance interobserver consistency, strengthen radiologic-pathologic correlation, and ultimately support more informed and individualized treatment decisions in patients with PitNETs. Prospective multicenter validation will be essential to establish its full clinical utility.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroendocrine TumorsPituitary NeoplasmsClinical RelevanceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultilineage pituitary neuroendocrine tumorNeuroendocrine tumorsPituitary adenoma

Identifiers

PMID42570111
PMCPMC13578009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.