ArticlePediatric radiology2026
Bone age estimation from chest radiographs using deep neural networks: a proof-of-concept study.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBone age (BA) is the gold standard for skeletal maturity assessment but is not routinely incorporated into pediatric growth evaluation workflow because it requires dedicated hand radiographs and specialist interpretation.
objectiveTo develop an estimation model for BA from chest radiographs using deep neural networks. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively analyzed children aged 3-15 years who underwent both chest and hand radiography at a tertiary center over 20 years. Patients with skeletal dysplasia or chest wall abnormalities were excluded. Reference BA was determined from hand radiographs by pediatric endocrinologists using the Tanner-Whitehouse 2 radius-ulna-short bones (TW2-RUS) method. Three pretrained deep neural networks were fine-tuned to estimate BA from chest radiographs using sex-non-considering models and sex-considering models. Model performance was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), root mean squared error (RMSE), and related metrics.
resultsOf 180 screened patients, 101 were included, yielding 237 chest radiographs. Estimated BA showed good concordance with the reference standard, with ICCs up to 0.81 (95% CI 0.48-0.97) for sex-non-considering models and 0.87 (95% CI 0.63-0.99) for sex-considering models. Corresponding RMSEs were 1.52 (95% CI 0.67-2.20) and 1.30 (95% CI 0.56-1.95), respectively.
conclusionThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates the feasibility of estimating BA from pediatric chest radiographs using deep neural networks. These findings suggest potential opportunistic use when dedicated hand radiographs are unavailable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42570094What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.