ArticlePediatric cardiology2026
Parent Perspectives on Optimal Communication About a New Prenatal Diagnosis of Complex Congenital Heart Disease: A Concept Mapping Study.
Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease (CHD) causes parental distress, at least in part due to uncertainties regarding the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and family impact. In initial fetal cardiology consultations, over half of dialogue focuses on uncertainties, and clinician communication can influence how parents cope. No prior study has gathered parental perspectives on what would be helpful when communicating about uncertainties in these initial conversations. The objective of this study was to gather parental perspectives on optimal clinician-caregiver communication about uncertainties after prenatal CHD diagnosis. Parents who received a prenatal diagnosis of CHD at one of two fetal cardiology centers were recruited to participate in a web-based concept mapping project conducted using four sequential activities. First, brainstorming collected responses to the prompt: "What are some things the team can do or say to help parents with the things that are not yet known?" Second, sorting grouped similar statements gathered during brainstorming. Third, rating assessed each statement in terms of perceived parental importance and impact using a Likert scale. Finally, after multidimensional scaling and hierarchical cluster analysis, parents participated in small group interpreting sessions, during which the findings were examined to identify targets for future intervention. We enrolled 31 parents, including 23 mothers, 8 fathers, and 2 bereaved parents. All received a CHD diagnosis between 2020 and 2023. Average participant age was 33 years (interquartile range: 5 years). Participants brainstormed 108 statements; they then sorted 90 distinct statements into 7 categories, called clusters. Clusters included topics of conveying empathy, educating about the diagnosis, preparing families to face uncertainties, and providing resources and support. Overall, the cluster, "Empathy from Professionals" was rated most important. "Empathy from Professionals" and "Realistic Expectations for after Birth" were rated as most impactful. This study identifies parent-prioritized, actionable communication strategies for addressing uncertainty after prenatal CHD diagnosis. Parents emphasized the importance of empathic communication, anchoring uncertainty within known and controllable factors, realistic expectations, and access to practical and peer support. These findings provide potential context-specific intervention targets for optimizing clinician-caregiver communication in fetal cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.