ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Post-TAVR Bundle Branch Re-entrant Ventricular Tachycardia Managed Without ICD: A Rare Turn of Rhythm.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundConduction disturbances are common after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), usually manifesting as atrioventricular block. Rarely, injury to the His-Purkinje system may create substrate for bundle branch re-entrant ventricular tachycardia (BBR-VT). CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old man developed new conduction abnormalities after TAVR and was discharged on ambulatory monitoring. Loop recorder interrogation revealed recurrent symptomatic wide-complex tachycardia. Repeat electrophysiology study demonstrated inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia with His-V-His activation confirming BBR-VT. Two reciprocal re-entrant circuits were inducible: one with antegrade conduction over the right bundle branch (left bundle branch block-pattern QRS) and the other in the reverse direction (right bundle branch block-pattern QRS). Right bundle branch ablation terminated the arrhythmia and induced persistent right bundle branch block. Given paroxysmal complete atrioventricular block, a dual-chamber pacemaker was implanted. With preserved ventricular function and no additional substrate, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion was deferred. DISCUSSION: BBR-VT is a rare but serious complication of post-TAVR conduction injury. Early recognition allows curative ablation and tailored device therapy. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: Post-TAVR conduction delay can facilitate BBR-VT. Successful ablation with pacing may avoid implantable cardioverter insertion implantation in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.